In a significant legal move, Sean “Diddy” Combs has launched a counteroffensive against allegations of sexual assault brought forward by a woman, aiming to negate some of the claims lodged against him due to their non-existence under law at the time the incident was said to have occurred. This development unfolded as Combs’ legal team filed a motion in a New York court seeking to dismiss particular allegations from Joi Dickerson-Deal, who has accused Combs of serious misconduct dating back to 1991.
According to documents submitted to the court, Combs’ defense posits that he cannot be held accountable for claims centered around revenge porn and human trafficking, as the laws pertaining to these accusations were not in force at the time Dickerson-Deal alleges the assault took place. The motion specifically targets statutes that came into effect long after the purported incident, highlighting a legal challenge in prosecuting historical claims under newly established laws.
Dickerson-Deal has publicly accused Combs of drugging her, recording a sexual assault without her consent, and subsequently sharing the footage within circles in the music industry. This allegation relates back to an incident she recounts from her time as a 19-year-old college student, following a date in Harlem. Combs, on his part, has vehemently denied these accusations, arguing that the lawsuit aims to leverage New York’s temporary extension of the statute of limitations for its benefit.
The legal team for Combs noted in their motion that the New York State Revenge Porn Law, under which part of the lawsuit is filed, was only codified in 2019, several decades after the claimed incident. Similarly, the New York Services for Victims of Human Trafficking Law, another piece of legislation cited in Dickerson-Deal’s claims, was enacted in 2007, further complicating the applicability of these laws to the case.
This legal battle comes amid escalating legal troubles for Combs, with federal authorities having recently executed raids on his properties in Los Angeles and Miami as part of a broader sex trafficking investigation. This probe represents a significant intensification of the legal scrutiny facing Combs, who has encountered numerous allegations of sexual abuse in recent years.
Among other lawsuits filed against Combs include a settlement reached a day after filing in November, where his former protégé and girlfriend, R&B singer Cassie, alleged years of sexual abuse, including rape. She claimed Combs coerced her into engaging in sexual acts with male prostitutes, which he recorded. Additionally, a music producer alleged in February that Combs pressured him into soliciting prostitutes and participating in sex acts with them. Further, another accusation comes from a woman who claims Combs raped her two decades ago when she was 17.
Despite the gravity and volume of these accusations, Combs and his legal representation have consistently denied all allegations, adopting a firm stance against the claims detailed in the various lawsuits. As the motion to dismiss parts of Dickerson-Deal’s lawsuit progresses, the spotlight intensifies on the legal strategies employed by high-profile figures to navigate accusations from the past, particularly in light of evolving legal frameworks and societal attitudes towards sexual misconduct.
Source
