If you watch as many video game showcases as I do, you begin to discover some patterns within the chat. Informal requests for sure video games have a means of snowballing into memes. In case you watched nearly any stream this June, you most likely caught pleas for Hollow Knight: Silksong information, even when that didn’t make a lot sense. Whereas Grand Theft Auto 6 remains to be the king of fan begging, I’ve seen a rival within the wings just lately: Bloodborne.
Followers of FromSoftware’s 2015 PlayStation 4 traditional have begged for any scrap of reports concerning the sport through the years. A few of these calls for are affordable; requests for a PC port, a 60 frames-per-second (fps) replace, or sequel appear honest contemplating its pedigree. However final month’s PlayStation State of Play pushed me to my limits after I noticed Sony’s YouTube chat floodied with chants of a Bloodborne remaster or remake.
As a profession enjoyable killer, I’m right here to burst some bubbles: No, Bloodborne doesn’t want a remake. I’d go so far as to say that few, if any, of your favourite video games do.
Remake overload
To offer the Bloodborne hive its due, requests for a remake or remaster aren’t unreasonable. We’re at the moment residing by a double-dip growth for the online game trade. Nearly each main writer is revisiting their classics to a point, whether or not or not it’s Sq. Enix with Final Fantasy 7, EA with Dead Space, or Sony with The Last of Us. Even Nintendo is all-in on that pattern with retouches of Super Mario RPG, Mario vs. Donkey Kong, and extra. In case you love Bloodborne, I can see why you may want Sony to offer it some overdue love.
What’s extra absurd is the concept a nine-year previous PS4 sport is in determined want of a revisit outdoors of a contemporary platform improve. Bloodborne nonetheless appears like a superbly fashionable sport by as we speak’s requirements. It nonetheless appears and performs nice as we speak; any flaws it has are nonetheless largely current in current FromSoftware video games like Elden Ring. Other than doubling its body charge, there’s little FromSoftware might doubtless do to retouch it in the identical means that Bluepoint did with its implausible modernization of Demon’s Souls, a rougher PS3 sport that benefited from a cleanup.
Arguments for a remake would really feel extra affordable have been it tough to get a replica of the unique, however Bloodborne doesn’t have that downside both. It’s a available sport you can purchase proper now on the PlayStation Retailer for $20 (or on sale for $10 on the time I’m penning this). You may even play it on PS Plus Additional in the event you’re already subscribed. A easy PC port can be welcome, however there’s no world through which it is smart to double-dip on a sport like this in 2024.
However that hasn’t stopped publishers from doing it anyhow.
Whereas I began this piece speaking to Bloodborne followers, that’s not what truly frustrates me. Fairly, requests for tasks like this converse to the broader state of a online game trade that’s making an attempt to squeeze as a lot cash out of gamers as attainable nowadays by nostalgia. Although it may be thrilling to see a forgotten or notably dated sport reimagined, publishers’ present obsession about bringing any and every part again from the lifeless — even when it’s not crucial — is constructing a tiring tradition that devalues the very video games corporations declare to have fun.
Take a look at 2024’s launch calendar and also you’ll discover that it’s dominated by remakes and remasters, a lot of that are head-scratchers. That began in January with an entirely pointless (and even detrimental) remaster of The Last of Us Part 2 and has continued for the previous six months. Persona 3, Brothers: A Story of Two Sons, Mario vs. Donkey Kong, and extra have padded out the primary half of the 12 months, and there’s far more to come back. Until Dawn, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid 3, and even Epic Mickey are all getting revisits this 12 months. Some tasks make sense, like Riven’s reimagining. Others are tougher to justify.
Take Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, as an example. Nintendo gave the GameCube traditional some love this 12 months with a “remake” that doesn’t actually do a lot {that a} port couldn’t have. Other than including tutorials and refreshing the already stable artwork, it feels about the identical because it did on the GameCube. Some even argue that it’s an inferior model resulting from slower turn-based battles and a drop from 60 fps on GameCube to 30 fps on Swap. Whereas I loved my time with it, I couldn’t assist however ask myself why Nintendo couldn’t have added the unique to the Swap On-line catalog slightly than charging followers for a full-priced revisit.
Different upcoming tasks have me much more skeptical. Konami’s Metallic Gear Strong Delta will remake the traditional Metallic Gear Strong 3: Snake Eater, however with out Hideo Kojima, the visionary sport maker who made the unique what it’s, on the helm. Bloober Workforce’s upcoming Silent Hill 2 remake is a equally odd promote, because it appears to clean over all of the off-kilter components of the PS1 period that outline the unique.
The message throughout the trade proper now appears to be that previous video games are damaged toys that want fixing. Fairly than embracing the warts or design selections of previous video games, every part has to look, sound, and play higher. Typically that may have a constructive affect; The Final of Us Half 1 got here with a crucial suite of accessibility features. Most of the time, although, a lot of as we speak’s remakes really feel extra like methods to take advantage of widespread IP for all they’re value. Did we get Persona 3 Reload as a result of the unique benefited from a touch-up, or did Atlus see a method to get cash out of followers because it toiled away on Persona 6? (For what it’s value, Reload strikes me as a artistic step down from Persona 3 Moveable, a sport you can purchase on fashionable platforms proper now).
That’s the place I come again round to my frustrations with Bloodborne mania. Remakes have begun to really feel much less like an act of inventive preservation and extra like calculated enterprise strikes that benefit from nostalgia. Only a few current remakes I’ve performed really feel like they’re in dialog with the sport they’re remaking or enthusiastic about what it means to deliver them again in a contemporary context. Remaining Fantasy VII Remake and Capcom’s Resident Evil remakes go that further mile, however I can’t say the identical for even well-done tasks like Useless House. How would a remake of Bloodborne deepen our understanding and appreciation for that sport in a means that simply replaying it couldn’t?
Typically I can’t assist however really feel like remakes have turn into a half-measure compromise for what gamers really want: A simple, authorized means to purchase and play previous video games. Why can’t I purchase the unique Silent Hill 2 on Steam? Why was it borderline not possible to legally play Paper Mario: The Thousand-Yr Door till final month? Can’t we simply put Bloodborne on PC and go away it there in its authentic glory? Each time followers purchase into the advertising and marketing spin, it appears like we get additional away from a real preservation resolution.
So no, I don’t wish to hold enjoying the identical classics with higher graphics or fashionable controls. I’d be completely happy as a clam simply with the ability to entry the video games I really like anytime. Is that an excessive amount of to ask?
Editors’ Suggestions
